A photo of Alta Dillion's slumber party taken 28 Apr 1898 Prineville,Crook,OR.
back l-r: Hazel Pollard, Nettie Summers, Edra Williamson & Beulah Crooks
middle l-r: Louise Summers, Wilda Soloman, Ione Elliott, Elizabeth Powell, Gertie Hodges & Alta Dillon
front l-r: Verna Cline, Agnes Elliott, Maude Van Gesner & Winnie Lewis
People in photo include: Hazel Pollard, Nettie Summers, Edra Williamson, Beulah Crooks, Louise Summers, Wilda Soloman, Ione Elliott, Elizabeth Powell, Gertie Hodges, Alta Dillon, Verna Cline, Agnes Elliott, Maude Van Gesner, and Winnie Lewis
Ever wonder what a slumber party looked like in the 1800s? Every child at Alta Dillion’s slumber party in 1898 Oregon wore nearly identical nightgowns and had their favorite doll.
I guess it's because back in those days it took quite long to take a picture and you had to sit really still and where not allowed to move. Therefore people did hardly ever smile in very old fotographs. It was too uncomfortable to keep that smile the whole time. It would have looked like a frown.
I explained it somewhere else here - back then being photographed took quite some time. Too long to keep smiling. So people in old pictures always look serious.
Now just stop and consider the fact that rather than taking a candid snapshot, each of these kids had to tramp on down to the local photography studio, get dolled up in their night clothes and sit for a formal studio portrait to document this sleepover.
Unless, of course, the sleepover was taking place at the photography studio to begin with.
Jim-I get your point. However, you must remember that no one had cameras at home or anywhere else at that time. So in order to have a memory, you had to go to the photography studio! Hense the reason for photos of the dead--usually, the people had no record of their families, so when people died (especially children), the parents wanted to have a keepsake!
Yes, I got that; which was the point I was making; that far from being a spontaneous snapshot such as we would have today, all these kids had to buggy-ride across town to the photographers and sit for a studio portrait. About as artificial and non-spontaneous as you can get with a troup of children.
There's always gotta be at least one kid starting some s*** at a slumber party, and that kid second row, second in from the right had to be it. She doesn't just have her somber photo face in, that is full on glare lol.
It was rare to find smiling faces. Photography was a serious business to record a memory retakes were expensive so posed," stiff" photos were the fashion. The little girl who was the hostess must have been from a wealthy family ... Nice photo!
back then none smiled I have some in the early 40s it was the photo grapher that called the shot they were nice kid not a cult your watching to much Tv and Jim Jones and MITT Romeny UTAH cults s***
How did they get so many girls to the studio in the horse and buggy? I've seen the slumber party photos of the early 1900s but these are mostly teenage girls having a good time. This one is so different.
Fascinating. Creepy bc not one child snuck in a smile. I know it was not the fashion - and it took a long time to take the shot - but still...unnatural.
They raised untold hell right after that. My Nonna (grandma, born in 1887) explained to me in the 1960s that no she is not going to smile in the picture because picture is serious. Sigh. She did forget herself a few times though hehehe. Priceless.
Heat escapes through the head! With a cap on you can even sleep with icicles dripping inside an attic from a roof leak and stay relatively warm...with a partner similarly clad of course...
The fact that they lived in a house to accommodate a huge sleepover also says that. Title should read "Ever wonder what an 1800's slumber party looked like for rich kids?"
Exactly. Just the size of the party suggests great wealth as do the nightgowns and nightcaps and of course the fact of the photo itself as the photographer came to the house.
I followed your link on FamilySearch re Alta's father - quite a story behind the scenes - but because your link to Alta Dillon was thru Ancestry.com.ca I couldn't see it [I'm in Australia and am not prepared to "free trial" any new subs with Ancestry - it always ends up costing far too much!
I spose back in those days it would have been rare to get your photo taken unless you could afford it? Besides the fact it took a long time to take a photo your probably weren't told to smile. I've also heard people's teeth weren't very good so they didn't even know how to smile? Regardless of the why, what or maybe's, this is a beautiful photo of the girls and their beloved dollies 😃
Orphanages didnt have that nice clothing or dolls like that. Not even sponsors would have paid for that or a photo. Look for pictures of old orphanages so you can see... My first thought was a girls school... But i have no real reason to doubt the submitters word since i dont know the familys financial situation.
Btw my ancestry is oregon... My ggrandfather had 10 girls and two boys... Two families or three could have made up that photo easily and yes they had sleepovers usually when babies were being born or after harvest and holidays.
Wonderful photo! Actually I recently read that in the 1800's people were considered to be insane or look insane if they smiled in photos. Hence serious photos. It also had to be the length of time to pose and it would be hard to smile that long.
Doesn't look fun because they weren't actually at a party. Look at the background - it's a painted set and not an actual home. This was set up at a photographer's studio - most likely to commemorate the event....
Do you ever notice that children in that era all don't seem very happy. Life then must have been hard and strict.. Just doesn't seem happy childhood, none smile or have that certain light in there eyes.. So sad and creepy
Friendships are the most important relationships. These snapshots of buddies and pals will likely remind you of your lifelong friends.
I get by with a little help from my friends. - The Beatles, 1967
Aristotle described a true friend as a “single soul dwelling in two bodies.” Time and/or distance don't matter in a real friendshi...
The 1800s where the end of the industrial revolution and the birth of scientists.
The Industrial Revolution began around 1760 and ran through the 1840's. Then began the birth of the profession of science. Louis Pasteur, Charles Darwin, Michael Faraday, Thomas Edison, and Nikola Te...